— Explainer
Inflation and the retirement you were promised.
Same statement balance, same nominal return, three different inflation paths. The chart is the whole argument.
The balance on your 401(k) statement is a count of dollars. What matters at retirement is what those dollars buy. The gap between the two numbers depends on one variable you do not get to pick: the inflation rate over the next thirty years. Below, the same starting balance runs through three different inflation worlds. The nominal return is identical in all three. The endpoints are not close.
— Three futures, same dollars
$500,000 today, 30years later, in today’s money
Starting balance $500,000, nominal return 7% per year, compounded. Values shown in today’s dollars via the exact Fisher equation. Same statement, three different worlds.
2% inflation
$2,101,252
after 30years, today’s dollars
3.5% inflation
$1,356,041
after 30years, today’s dollars
5% inflation
$880,652
after 30years, today’s dollars
— The inflation you don’t see eating your retirement
The 2% path is the Fed’s target. The 5% path is the 1970s happening to you.
Across the 8 complete decades of post-1950 CPI data, U.S. inflation has averaged 3.5% per year. The 1970s ran at 7.2%. The 2010s ran at 1.8%. The 2%, 3.5%, and 5% paths in the chart are not scenarios pulled from a hat. They are, in order, the 2010s, a typical post-war decade, and the 1970s. All three have happened, on U.S. soil, inside a single career.
The planning mistake is to pick one and call it the answer. The 2% path is the policy target, not the realized number. A retirement plan that only works in the 2% world is a plan that requires the Fed to succeed every year for thirty straight years. That has not happened. The 1970s are not a tail event. They are a decade that occurred. Your plan should work in the middle path and survive the high path.
The right move is not to forecast inflation. You cannot. The right move is to own assets that reprice with it. TIPS and I-bonds do this explicitly. Equities do it eventually. Fixed-rate nominal bonds do the opposite. The allocation question stops being “what is my expected return” and starts being “how much of my balance keeps up when the basket of groceries runs hot.”
Run your own numbers in the retirement drawdown calculator, which lets you flex starting balance, allocation, and withdrawal rate against Bear, Base, and Bull scenarios. If you want the short version of the Fisher-equation math that powers the chart above, that lives in the companion inflation and retirement explainer, which walks through nominal vs real one input at a time.
— FAQ
Inflation and retirement savings, answered.
— Free · Daily
Get the briefing in your inbox.
One plain-language market briefing after the close, every market day. Free forever.